TO FIND THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH ABOUT THE KILLING OF CHARLIE KIRK

TO FIND THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH ABOUT THE KILLING OF CHARLIE KIRK

By Andy Weddington

Friday, 19 September 2025

One must verify or expel his doubts, and convert them into the certainty of Yes or No.  - Thomas Carlyle

Nine days ago Charlie Kirk was assassinated. 

Who pulled that trigger?

Those responsible for investigating - local, state, federal law enforcement - reported to the public the assassin is an angry, confused, distraught turned radical 22 years old white male. 

Tyler Robinson is in custody. 

But is he the who?

Cautioned President Ronald Reagan, trust but verify. 

During the past few days I've watched and rewatched a couple of interesting YouTube videos by weapons/ballistics experts (term I dislike but serves the purpose) who analyzed the killing frame by frame using event video from multiple angles.

Their conclusions could not be more in disagreement. 

Same event. Same footage. 

One gent concluded the killing round came from the front - ricocheted off the top of Charlie's body armor and struck him on the left side of his neck. 

Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged and, as noted, is in custody. 

The other gent concluded the killing round came from the right and behind Charlie - striking just below his right ear and jaw line exiting the left front (explaining the gaping hole as exit wound the other analyst concluded as the entry wound).

No one aligning with that likewise compelling hypothesis has been arrested. Much less considered, as far as I can find. 

Both gents agree Charlie died instantly. 

So who killed Charlie Kirk?

Verification means entertaining every possibility even the seeming absurd, preposterous and ridiculous. Cross-checking. Doing the math - literally and figuratively, if you will. It means painful fact finding. Leaving nothing out of the equation as to find absolute certainty. There's no doubt. Truth. 

Autopsy. 

Multiple independent objective sources with eyes on Charlie's corpse could confirm whether or not there's entry wound below right ear. 

That simple fact would either discredit the one theorist (who's insistent the FBI is lying) or take the investigation in another direction.   

About a month ago I listened to a nearly two hours one-on-one sit-down between Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson. 

Charlie Kirk's knowledge and logic and skills at making sense of madness then concisely with clarity explaining heavy and sometimes dark topics of national and international concern was impressive. 

Bashful he was not. 

There's no question he had enemies aplenty and aplenty who wanted to silence him.  

This morning I listened to that conversation again. 

His remarks - answers and questions - feel different in the context of death. 

Pay attention to the hackles on back of neck and gut and nagging senses.

From all information publicly available to date, reflecting on history, and while being logical, objective, questioning, and pragmatic, only interested in absolute truth ...

Am I, but interested and concerned citizen wanting only truth and justice, absolutely certain Tyler Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk?

No.